• wangxl's avatar
    222 · ab29540d
    wangxl authored
    ab29540d
config.js 16.2 KB
const standardList = [
  { meaning: "资金预算有总量、强度、结构说明,且与项目实施内容、目标考核指标相关。", max: 10, score: "7-10", title: "相关", title3: "资金预算应以项目研究开发任务目标为依据,预算的总量、强度:结构等应符合项目任务的规律和特点,项目各任务之间资金分配合理。", order: 1, row3: 3, title2: "目标相关性(10分)", row2: 3, title1: "资金预算(40分)", row1: 12, showIndex: 1 },
  { meaning: "资金预算有总量、强度、结构说明,与项目实施内容、目标考核指标基本相关。", max: 6, score: "1-6", title: "基本相关", title3: "资金预算应以项目研究开发任务目标为依据,预算的总量、强度:结构等应符合项目任务的规律和特点,项目各任务之间资金分配合理。", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "目标相关性(10分)", row2: 0, title1: "资金预算(40分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "资金预算总量、强度、结构与项目实施内容、目标、考核指不相关。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "不相关", title3: "资金预算应以项目研究开发任务目标为依据,预算的总量、强度:结构等应符合项目任务的规律和特点,项目各任务之间资金分配合理。", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "目标相关性(10分)", row2: 0, title1: "资金预算(40分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "资金预算有开支范围的依据及标准说明,且与现行相关财务度相符。", max: 10, score: "7-10", title: "相符", title3: "项目预算科目的开支范围、开支标准等应符合国家和云南省有关财务制度,以及科研经费管理制度的相关规定", order: 2, row3: 3, title2: "政策相符性(10分)", row2: 3, title1: "资金预算(40分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "资金预算有开支范围的依据说明,与现行相关财务制度基本相符。", max: 6, score: "1-6", title: "基本相符", title3: "项目预算科目的开支范围、开支标准等应符合国家和云南省有关财务制度,以及科研经费管理制度的相关规定", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "政策相符性(10分)", row2: 0, title1: "资金预算(40分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "资金预算无开支范围的依据说明。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "不相符", title3: "项目预算科目的开支范围、开支标准等应符合国家和云南省有关财务制度,以及科研经费管理制度的相关规定", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "政策相符性(10分)", row2: 0, title1: "资金预算(40分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "资金预算有与同类研发活动支出水平的对比分析,资金预算与产出匹配性高。", max: 10, score: "7-10", title: "合理", title3: "预算应综合考虑国内外同类研究开发活动的状况、相关产业特点、同类研发活动支出水平、技术创新风险等因素,结合项目研究开发的现有基础、前期投入和支撑条件,考量项目预算与同类或相近科研活动支出水平的匹配性。", order: 3, row3: 3, title2: "经济合理性(10分)", row2: 3, title1: "资金预算(40分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "资金预算有与同类研发活动支出水平的对比分析,资金预算与产出基本匹配。", max: 6, score: "1-6", title: "基本合理", title3: "预算应综合考虑国内外同类研究开发活动的状况、相关产业特点、同类研发活动支出水平、技术创新风险等因素,结合项目研究开发的现有基础、前期投入和支撑条件,考量项目预算与同类或相近科研活动支出水平的匹配性。", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "经济合理性(10分)", row2: 0, title1: "资金预算(40分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "资金预算明显高于同类研发活动支出水平,资金预算与产出不匹配。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "不合理", title3: "预算应综合考虑国内外同类研究开发活动的状况、相关产业特点、同类研发活动支出水平、技术创新风险等因素,结合项目研究开发的现有基础、前期投入和支撑条件,考量项目预算与同类或相近科研活动支出水平的匹配性。", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "经济合理性(10分)", row2: 0, title1: "资金预算(40分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "财政资金预算能保障项目研发任务实施和研发目标实现。", max: 10, score: "7-10", title: "可行", title3: "财政资金预算应考虑支撑项目研发任务的实施和研发目标的实现,有助于项目技术指标及经济、社会、生态环境和可持续影响指标的完成。", order: 4, row3: 3, title2: "任务完成可行性(10分)", row2: 3, title1: "资金预算(40分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "财政资金预算基本能保障项目研发任务实施和研发目标实现。", max: 6, score: "1-6", title: "基本可行", title3: "财政资金预算应考虑支撑项目研发任务的实施和研发目标的实现,有助于项目技术指标及经济、社会、生态环境和可持续影响指标的完成。", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "任务完成可行性(10分)", row2: 0, title1: "资金预算(40分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "财政资金预算难以保障项目研发任务实施和研发目标实现。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "不可行", title3: "财政资金预算应考虑支撑项目研发任务的实施和研发目标的实现,有助于项目技术指标及经济、社会、生态环境和可持续影响指标的完成。", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "任务完成可行性(10分)", row2: 0, title1: "资金预算(40分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标规范,包括产出指标、效益指标、满意度指标等3个(含)以上指标。", max: 4, score: "3-4", title: "完整", title3: "绩效目标规范完整性(4分)", order: 5, row3: 3, title2: "完整性(7.5分)", row2: 6, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 23, showIndex: 2 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标较规范,包括产出指标、效益指标、满意度指标等1-2个指标。", max: 2, score: "1-2", title: "基本完整", title3: "绩效目标规范完整性(4分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "完整性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标不规范、不完整。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "不完整", title3: "绩效目标规范完整性(4分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "完整性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标设置清晰,能反映项目实施的主要内容、预期产出和效果,指标值具体可量化。", max: 3.5, score: "2-3.5", title: "清晰", title3: "绩效目标明确清晰性.(3.5分)", order: 6, row3: 3, title2: "完整性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标设置基本清晰。", max: 1, score: "1", title: "基本清晰", title3: "绩效目标明确清晰性.(3.5分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "完整性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标设置不清晰。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "不清晰", title3: "绩效目标明确清晰性.(3.5分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "完整性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标与项目实施内容和考核指标紧密相关。", max: 4, score: "3-4", title: "相关", title3: "绩效目标相关性。(4分)", order: 7, row3: 3, title2: "相关性(7.5分)", row2: 5, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标与项目实施内容和考核指标基本相关。", max: 2, score: "1-2", title: "基本相关", title3: "绩效目标相关性。(4分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "相关性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标与项目实施内容和考核指标不相关。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "不相关", title3: "绩效目标相关性。(4分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "相关性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效指标尚未实现,具有实现的可能性。", max: 3.5, score: "1-3.5", title: "科学", title3: "绩效指标科学性。(3.5分)", order: 8, row3: 2, title2: "相关性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效指标已实现,或项目实施难以确保绩效指标实现。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "不科学", title3: "绩效指标科学性。(3.5分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "相关性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标与资金规模匹配。", max: 4, score: "3-4", title: "合理", title3: "资金匹配性。(4分)", order: 9, row3: 3, title2: "适当性(7.5分)", row2: 6, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标与资金规模基本匹配。", max: 2, score: "1-2", title: "基本合理", title3: "资金匹配性。(4分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "适当性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标与资金规模不匹配。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "不合理", title3: "资金匹配性。(4分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "适当性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标符合正常水平或科研规律。", max: 4, score: "3-4", title: "匹配", title3: "绩效目标合理性。(3.5分)", order: 10, row3: 3, title2: "适当性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标基本符合正常水平或科研规律。", max: 2, score: "1-2", title: "基本匹配", title3: "绩效目标合理性。(3.5分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "适当性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标不符合正常水平或科研规律。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "不匹配", title3: "绩效目标合理性。(3.5分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "适当性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标经过充分论证和合理测算。", max: 4, score: "3-4", title: "可行", title3: "绩效目标实现可能性:(4分)", order: 11, row3: 3, title2: "可行性(7.5分)", row2: 6, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标经过论证和测算,但论证的充分性和合理性不够。", max: 2, score: "1-2", title: "基本可行", title3: "绩效目标实现可能性:(4分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "可行性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "绩效目标未经过论证和测算。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "不可行", title3: "绩效目标实现可能性:(4分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "可行性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "项目实施方案和具体措施可行,能确保绩效目标实现。", max: 4, score: "3-4", title: "匹配", title3: "项目实施方案匹配性(3.5分)", order: 12, row3: 3, title2: "可行性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "项目实施方案和具体措施基本可行,能确保绩效目标基本实现。", max: 2, score: "1-2", title: "基本匹配", title3: "项目实施方案匹配性(3.5分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "可行性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "项目实施方案和具体措施不太可行,难以确保绩效目标实现。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "不匹配", title3: "项目实施方案匹配性(3.5分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "可行性(7.5分)", row2: 0, title1: "绩效目标(30分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "项目申报单位建立了科研项目管理、资金管理等办法制度,并严格执行落实。", max: 4, score: "4-5", title: "建立并落实", title3: "申报单位是否建立了项目管理制度、资金管理制度,以及以上制度的落实情况。", order: 13, row3: 3, title2: "内控制度健全性(5分)", row2: 3, title1: "申报单位管理能力(20分)", row1: 9, showIndex: 3 },
  { meaning: "项目申报单位建立了科研项目管理、资金管理等办法制度,但执行落实不到位。", max: 3, score: "1-3", title: "建立但落实不好", title3: "申报单位是否建立了项目管理制度、资金管理制度,以及以上制度的落实情况。", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "内控制度健全性(5分)", row2: 0, title1: "申报单位管理能力(20分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "项目申报单位未建立项目管理制度、资金管理制度。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "未建立", title3: "申报单位是否建立了项目管理制度、资金管理制度,以及以上制度的落实情况。", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "内控制度健全性(5分)", row2: 0, title1: "申报单位管理能力(20分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "申报单位有承诺或提供的材料能保障研究所需的条件。", max: 5, score: "1-5", title: "是", title3: "申报单位是否拥有保璧项目开展所需的设备、场所等设施", order: 14, row3: 2, title2: "配套支撑能力(5分)", row2: 2, title1: "申报单位管理能力(20分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "申报单位无承诺。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "否", title3: "申报单位是否拥有保璧项目开展所需的设备、场所等设施", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "配套支撑能力(5分)", row2: 0, title1: "申报单位管理能力(20分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "申报单位已聘用科研(财务)助理,已出台科研(财务)助理制度,并严格执行落实。", max: 5, score: "1-5", title: "是", title3: "申报单位是否设置科研(财务)助理,为科研人员在项目预算编制和调剂、经费支出、财务决算和验收等方面提供专业化服务。", order: 15, row3: 2, title2: "科研服务能力(5分)", row2: 2, title1: "申报单位管理能力(20分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "申报单位未出台、未执行科研(财务)助理制度。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "否", title3: "申报单位是否设置科研(财务)助理,为科研人员在项目预算编制和调剂、经费支出、财务决算和验收等方面提供专业化服务。", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "科研服务能力(5分)", row2: 0, title1: "申报单位管理能力(20分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "申报单位科研诚信管理符合要求。", max: 5, score: "1-5", title: "符合", title3: "申报单位科研诚信记录是否符合要求。", order: 16, row3: 2, title2: "科研诚信(5分)", row2: 2, title1: "申报单位管理能力(20分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "申报单位科研诚信管理不符合要求。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "不符合", title3: "申报单位科研诚信记录是否符合要求。", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "科研诚信(5分)", row2: 0, title1: "申报单位管理能力(20分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "自筹资金已落实,来源有保障,能确保项目研发任务实施和研发目标实现。", max: 5, score: "5", title: "有", title3: "自筹资金是否按指南等要求匹配,预算来源是否有保障。", order: 17, row3: 2, title2: "自筹资金保障能力(5分)", row2: 2, title1: "预算保障能力(10分)", row1: 6, showIndex: 4 },
  { meaning: "", max: 0, score: "0", title: "无", title3: "自筹资金是否按指南等要求匹配,预算来源是否有保障。", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "自筹资金保障能力(5分)", row2: 0, title1: "预算保障能力(10分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "", max: 3, score: "1-3", title: "是", title3: "资产负债率是否小于70%。(3分)", order: 18, row3: 2, title2: "申报单位运营风险(5分)", row2: 4, title1: "预算保障能力(10分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "项目申报单位提供的财务报告提取数据测算。", max: 0, score: "0", title: "否(大于等于 70%)", title3: "资产负债率是否小于70%。(3分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "申报单位运营风险(5分)", row2: 0, title1: "预算保障能力(10分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "项目申报单位提供的财务报告提取数据测算。", max: 2, score: "1-2", title: "是", title3: "流动比率、速动比率、现金流等是否在正常范围内(2分)", order: 19, row3: 2, title2: "申报单位运营风险(5分)", row2: 0, title1: "预算保障能力(10分)", row1: 0 },
  { meaning: "", max: 0, score: "0", title: "否", title3: "流动比率、速动比率、现金流等是否在正常范围内(2分)", order: 0, row3: 0, title2: "申报单位运营风险(5分)", row2: 0, title1: "预算保障能力(10分)", row1: 0 }
]
export {
  standardList
}